If five years ago I had described an organization like the University of San Carlos to you and told you that in five years it'd bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives, you'd have thought me coprophagous. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, its functionaries have always found a way to evoke a misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances. So long as the devastating inequities that characterize our society persist, the University of San Carlos's hangers-on will be unable to deny that I plan to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that perception becomes reality if one is brainwashed for long enough. Are you with me -- or against me? Whatever you decide, the University of San Carlos and I are as different as chalk and cheese. It, for instance, wants to waste our time and money. I, on the other hand, want to get my message about the University of San Carlos out to the world. That's why I need to tell you that when one looks at the increasing influence of opportunism in our culture one sees that the University of San Carlos's signature is on everything. So how come its fingerprints are nowhere to be found? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that once you understand the University of San Carlos's expositions, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting the University of San Carlos make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society.

Believe it or not, when the University of San Carlos says that the laws of nature don't apply to it, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. The University of San Carlos's self-satisfied, licentious effusions are chockablock with exhibitionism. That conclusion is not based on some sort of lazy, obnoxious philosophy or on the University of San Carlos-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that the University of San Carlos's worshippers have shared the rostrum with bookish quidnuncs at recent symposia. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: I'm willing to accept that the absurdity of the University of San Carlos's deeds requires no further comment. I'm even willing to accept that it makes it sound like it's some perfect angel of unstained ethical standards. But its criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, the University of San Carlos's criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in its "I think … I believe … I feel" game.

In a recent essay, the University of San Carlos stated that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by lethargic menaces for the purpose of population reduction. Since the arguments it made in the rest of its essay are based in part on that assumption, it should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but its positions are shrouded in a fog of credentialism. The University of San Carlos vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about it and about hypothetical solutions to our the University of San Carlos problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that I've known some crybabies who were impressively daft. However, the University of San Carlos is contemptible and that trumps daft every time.

If there's a rule, and the University of San Carlos keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, every so often, the University of San Carlos tries turning positions of leadership into positions of complacency. Whenever it gets caught doing so it raises a terrific hullabaloo calculated to hurt others physically or emotionally. A central point of the University of San Carlos's belief systems is the notion that once the University of San Carlos has approved of something it can't possibly be uncouth. Perhaps it should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think it'd find that it says that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. But then it turns around and says that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. You know, you can't have it both ways, the University of San Carlos. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me introduce an important but underrepresented angle on the University of San Carlos's unconscionable modes of thought, and together we'll expose all of its filthy, subversive, and destructive activities. We'll convert retreat into advance. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.

so na hug rag na pugus q skwila nanhi. ^^

btaw2, di ta sunod2 sa bad ky maoy na.andan...